Best Known (209−75, 209, s)-Nets in Base 3
(209−75, 209, 156)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (134, 209, 156)-net over F3, using
- 15 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (134, 224, 156)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 112, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 112, 78)-net over F9, using
(209−75, 209, 265)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (134, 209, 265)-net over F3, using
(209−75, 209, 3487)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (134, 209, 3488)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (134, 208, 3488)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 1742 871352 070250 346259 087851 306117 674205 311505 246574 964041 707195 781584 089802 924770 220140 682475 832129 > 3208 [i]