Best Known (233−75, 233, s)-Nets in Base 3
(233−75, 233, 168)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (158, 233, 168)-net over F3, using
- 31 times duplication [i] based on digital (157, 232, 168)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (11, 48, 20)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 19)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F3 with g(F) = 9, N(F) = 19, and 1 place with degree 3 [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 19, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 19)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (109, 184, 148)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (17, 92, 74)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (17, 92, 74)-net over F9, using
- digital (11, 48, 20)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(233−75, 233, 405)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (158, 233, 405)-net over F3, using
(233−75, 233, 7150)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (158, 233, 7151)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (158, 232, 7151)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 492 698342 138631 611249 913137 605194 478033 915959 270793 983827 442096 238510 808995 766850 481463 818794 555344 987319 603735 > 3232 [i]