Best Known (235−75, 235, s)-Nets in Base 3
(235−75, 235, 172)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (160, 235, 172)-net over F3, using
- 31 times duplication [i] based on digital (159, 234, 172)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (13, 50, 24)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 23)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 24, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 23)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (109, 184, 148)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (17, 92, 74)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (17, 92, 74)-net over F9, using
- digital (13, 50, 24)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(235−75, 235, 419)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (160, 235, 419)-net over F3, using
(235−75, 235, 7590)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (160, 235, 7591)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (160, 234, 7591)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 4439 782380 316689 221384 497132 790902 891469 431221 299595 803748 291777 377507 289024 258439 110495 184896 992252 203166 626887 > 3234 [i]