Best Known (159, 159+75, s)-Nets in Base 3
(159, 159+75, 172)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (159, 234, 172)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (13, 50, 24)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 23)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 24, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 23)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (109, 184, 148)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (17, 92, 74)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (17, 92, 74)-net over F9, using
- digital (13, 50, 24)-net over F3, using
(159, 159+75, 412)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (159, 234, 412)-net over F3, using
(159, 159+75, 7367)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (159, 234, 7368)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (159, 233, 7368)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 1480 991639 508504 799633 269469 222837 780927 378552 702948 144975 505496 006569 776974 375943 506374 932701 442545 506104 861969 > 3233 [i]