Best Known (65, 65+75, s)-Nets in Base 3
(65, 65+75, 52)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (65, 140, 52)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (13, 50, 24)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 23)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 24, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 23)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (15, 90, 28)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 27)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 27)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (13, 50, 24)-net over F3, using
(65, 65+75, 64)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (65, 140, 64)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (49, 140, 64)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (49, 63)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 49 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (49, 63)-sequence over F3, using
(65, 65+75, 418)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (65, 140, 419)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (65, 139, 419)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 2 099071 297950 507845 030013 096045 051276 017611 545387 616546 194571 831935 > 3139 [i]