Best Known (44, 44+76, s)-Nets in Base 3
(44, 44+76, 42)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (44, 120, 42)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (39, 120, 42)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 41)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 42, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 41)-sequence over F3, using
(44, 44+76, 56)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (44, 120, 56)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (40, 120, 56)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 55)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 40 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 55)-sequence over F3, using
(44, 44+76, 146)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (44, 120, 147)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (44, 119, 147)-net in base 3, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(3119, 147, S3, 75), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 16 137915 552723 745131 682214 391750 091116 522557 190679 736158 328855 711764 240731 / 23372 130007 496452 > 3119 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(3119, 147, S3, 75), but