Best Known (156−77, 156, s)-Nets in Base 3
(156−77, 156, 64)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (79, 156, 64)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (15, 53, 28)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 27)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 27)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (26, 103, 36)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (26, 35)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 36, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (26, 35)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (15, 53, 28)-net over F3, using
(156−77, 156, 84)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (79, 156, 84)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (71, 156, 84)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (71, 83)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 71 and N(F) ≥ 84, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (71, 83)-sequence over F3, using
(156−77, 156, 626)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (79, 156, 627)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (79, 155, 627)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 89 972561 968480 214823 946264 803135 782023 497014 247285 537647 387621 084432 306877 > 3155 [i]