Best Known (161, 161+77, s)-Nets in Base 3
(161, 161+77, 168)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (161, 238, 168)-net over F3, using
- 31 times duplication [i] based on digital (160, 237, 168)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (11, 49, 20)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 19)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F3 with g(F) = 9, N(F) = 19, and 1 place with degree 3 [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 19, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 19)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (111, 188, 148)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (17, 94, 74)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (17, 94, 74)-net over F9, using
- digital (11, 49, 20)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(161, 161+77, 406)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (161, 238, 406)-net over F3, using
(161, 161+77, 7066)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (161, 238, 7067)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (161, 237, 7067)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 119867 541254 048429 593236 994974 986992 067712 552661 968127 525310 178850 893632 431731 963062 795954 120250 278666 735081 721549 > 3237 [i]