Best Known (162, 162+77, s)-Nets in Base 3
(162, 162+77, 172)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (162, 239, 172)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (13, 51, 24)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 23)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 24, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 23)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (111, 188, 148)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (17, 94, 74)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (17, 94, 74)-net over F9, using
- digital (13, 51, 24)-net over F3, using
(162, 162+77, 413)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (162, 239, 413)-net over F3, using
(162, 162+77, 7274)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (162, 239, 7275)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (162, 238, 7275)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 358874 019189 637313 430174 991113 584050 618346 594907 225478 280972 292581 319867 215032 743501 873466 748843 757645 385440 579053 > 3238 [i]