Best Known (224−78, 224, s)-Nets in Base 3
(224−78, 224, 162)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (146, 224, 162)-net over F3, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (146, 228, 162)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (32, 114, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (32, 114, 81)-net over F9, using
(224−78, 224, 308)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (146, 224, 308)-net over F3, using
(224−78, 224, 4195)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (146, 224, 4196)-net in base 3, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 75038 876711 606350 360259 810139 757511 132506 238374 996166 484625 878122 128269 689527 074109 506835 058296 832378 132337 > 3224 [i]