Best Known (163, 163+78, s)-Nets in Base 3
(163, 163+78, 168)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (163, 241, 168)-net over F3, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (163, 242, 168)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (11, 50, 20)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 19)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F3 with g(F) = 9, N(F) = 19, and 1 place with degree 3 [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 19, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 19)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (113, 192, 148)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (17, 96, 74)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (17, 96, 74)-net over F9, using
- digital (11, 50, 20)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(163, 163+78, 410)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (163, 241, 410)-net over F3, using
(163, 163+78, 6796)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (163, 241, 6797)-net in base 3, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 9 691751 555618 499855 785089 519924 724573 978402 871639 216288 827426 145462 521927 821163 879719 839775 099515 036852 863457 165435 > 3241 [i]