Best Known (161, 161+79, s)-Nets in Base 3
(161, 161+79, 167)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (161, 240, 167)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (9, 48, 19)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 18)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 19, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 18)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (113, 192, 148)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (17, 96, 74)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (17, 96, 74)-net over F9, using
- digital (9, 48, 19)-net over F3, using
(161, 161+79, 388)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (161, 240, 388)-net over F3, using
(161, 161+79, 6422)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (161, 240, 6423)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (161, 239, 6423)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 1 079779 438004 554370 075951 184562 063412 168129 184353 957933 708130 960568 172099 111654 554465 005455 489329 762105 660621 033875 > 3239 [i]