Best Known (164, 164+79, s)-Nets in Base 3
(164, 164+79, 168)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (164, 243, 168)-net over F3, using
- 31 times duplication [i] based on digital (163, 242, 168)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (11, 50, 20)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 19)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F3 with g(F) = 9, N(F) = 19, and 1 place with degree 3 [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 19, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 19)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (113, 192, 148)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (17, 96, 74)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (17, 96, 74)-net over F9, using
- digital (11, 50, 20)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(164, 164+79, 407)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (164, 243, 407)-net over F3, using
(164, 164+79, 6992)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (164, 243, 6993)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (164, 242, 6993)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 29 190705 814400 143041 841631 511657 953146 117890 270999 274281 959429 208626 477756 146382 476472 217490 282540 049836 738680 830283 > 3242 [i]