Best Known (90, 90+79, s)-Nets in Base 3
(90, 90+79, 69)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (90, 169, 69)-net over F3, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (90, 174, 69)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (21, 63, 32)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 31)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 31)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (27, 111, 37)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26, N(F) = 36, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 36, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (21, 63, 32)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(90, 90+79, 105)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (90, 169, 105)-net over F3, using
(90, 90+79, 836)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (90, 169, 837)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (90, 168, 837)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 146 288717 068747 676862 385587 865042 559423 718543 564875 976346 199426 998982 426585 842011 > 3168 [i]