Best Known (169−80, 169, s)-Nets in Base 3
(169−80, 169, 69)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (89, 169, 69)-net over F3, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (89, 171, 69)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (21, 62, 32)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 31)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 31)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (27, 109, 37)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26, N(F) = 36, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 36, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (21, 62, 32)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(169−80, 169, 101)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (89, 169, 101)-net over F3, using
(169−80, 169, 778)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (89, 169, 779)-net in base 3, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 430 358781 680363 196484 748397 697489 694082 095555 642422 245071 102647 175339 340102 455345 > 3169 [i]