Best Known (210−81, 210, s)-Nets in Base 3
(210−81, 210, 156)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (129, 210, 156)-net over F3, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (129, 214, 156)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 107, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 107, 78)-net over F9, using
(210−81, 210, 216)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (129, 210, 216)-net over F3, using
(210−81, 210, 2413)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (129, 210, 2414)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (129, 209, 2414)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 5237 615675 551941 468076 943817 264717 200566 798673 569116 075669 223450 648965 401727 539655 122536 382576 161425 > 3209 [i]