Best Known (224−81, 224, s)-Nets in Base 3
(224−81, 224, 156)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (143, 224, 156)-net over F3, using
- 18 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (143, 242, 156)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 121, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 121, 78)-net over F9, using
(224−81, 224, 275)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (143, 224, 275)-net over F3, using
(224−81, 224, 3564)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (143, 224, 3565)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (143, 223, 3565)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 25263 298795 535407 716781 238116 529957 153955 923212 806526 647138 120534 041551 943322 675895 693490 848488 690500 048097 > 3223 [i]