Best Known (248−81, 248, s)-Nets in Base 3
(248−81, 248, 168)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (167, 248, 168)-net over F3, using
- 31 times duplication [i] based on digital (166, 247, 168)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (11, 51, 20)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 19)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F3 with g(F) = 9, N(F) = 19, and 1 place with degree 3 [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 19, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 19)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (115, 196, 148)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (17, 98, 74)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (17, 98, 74)-net over F9, using
- digital (11, 51, 20)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(248−81, 248, 409)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (167, 248, 409)-net over F3, using
(248−81, 248, 6926)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (167, 248, 6927)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (167, 247, 6927)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 7077 957061 109799 701276 960886 061243 818209 253905 153980 081548 000494 143283 959865 422398 210842 448180 742902 773541 186958 334129 > 3247 [i]