Best Known (68, 68+81, s)-Nets in Base 3
(68, 68+81, 52)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (68, 149, 52)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (13, 53, 24)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 23)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 24, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 23)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (15, 96, 28)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 27)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 27)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (13, 53, 24)-net over F3, using
(68, 68+81, 72)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (68, 149, 72)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (67, 149, 72)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (67, 71)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 67 and N(F) ≥ 72, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (67, 71)-sequence over F3, using
(68, 68+81, 421)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (68, 149, 422)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (68, 148, 422)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 44205 377691 534751 194613 082013 129262 930022 484097 633008 423447 474660 491025 > 3148 [i]