Best Known (81, 81+81, s)-Nets in Base 3
(81, 81+81, 64)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (81, 162, 64)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (15, 55, 28)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 27)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 27)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (26, 107, 36)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (26, 35)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 36, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (26, 35)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (15, 55, 28)-net over F3, using
(81, 81+81, 84)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (81, 162, 84)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (71, 162, 84)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (71, 83)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 71 and N(F) ≥ 84, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (71, 83)-sequence over F3, using
(81, 81+81, 617)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (81, 162, 618)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (81, 161, 618)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 66069 565130 817442 011158 707309 153103 336457 565678 845922 012730 468011 407572 208145 > 3161 [i]