Best Known (210−82, 210, s)-Nets in Base 3
(210−82, 210, 156)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (128, 210, 156)-net over F3, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (128, 212, 156)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 106, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 106, 78)-net over F9, using
(210−82, 210, 209)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (128, 210, 209)-net over F3, using
(210−82, 210, 2202)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (128, 210, 2203)-net in base 3, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 15972 427354 667223 527980 923765 406280 573223 718587 435147 405717 241294 533734 820599 345345 458000 375260 596391 > 3210 [i]