Best Known (250−83, 250, s)-Nets in Base 3
(250−83, 250, 167)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (167, 250, 167)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (9, 50, 19)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 18)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 19, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 18)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (117, 200, 148)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (17, 100, 74)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (17, 100, 74)-net over F9, using
- digital (9, 50, 19)-net over F3, using
(250−83, 250, 391)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (167, 250, 391)-net over F3, using
(250−83, 250, 6335)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (167, 250, 6336)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (167, 249, 6336)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 63882 061849 189262 555161 965050 922819 140305 401974 524534 226957 089434 136898 788315 260373 395838 799989 493758 247968 641727 819137 > 3249 [i]