Best Known (129, 129+83, s)-Nets in Base 3
(129, 129+83, 156)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (129, 212, 156)-net over F3, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (129, 214, 156)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 107, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 107, 78)-net over F9, using
(129, 129+83, 209)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (129, 212, 209)-net over F3, using
(129, 129+83, 2262)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (129, 212, 2263)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (129, 211, 2263)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 47145 640705 631945 181760 838989 691528 268669 571167 638585 983379 982417 168413 685727 231469 800308 755816 901471 > 3211 [i]