MinT - Best Known (165−85, 165, s)-Nets in Base 3

Best Known (165−85, 165, s)-Nets in Base 3

(165−85, 165, 60)-Net over F₃ — Constructive and digital

Digital (80, 165, 60)-net over F₃, using

3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (80, 168, 60)-net over F₃, using
- (u,Â u+v)-construction [i] based on
  1. digital (15, 59, 28)-net over F₃, using
    - net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 27)-sequence over F₃, using
      - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₃ with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
        an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
  2. digital (21, 109, 32)-net over F₃, using
    - net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 31)-sequence over F₃, using
      - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₃ with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 32, using
        an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]

(165−85, 165, 84)-Net over F₃ — Digital

Digital (80, 165, 84)-net over F₃, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (71, 165, 84)-net over F₃, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (71, 83)-sequence over F₃, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₃ with g(F) = 71 and N(F) ≥ 84, using
    - algebraic function fields over â„¤₃ by Niederreiter/Xing [i]

(165−85, 165, 561)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s

There is no (80, 165, 562)-net in base 3, because

1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (80, 164, 562)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3^mÂ â‰¥ 1 775212 298407 853876 674355 215669 295354 448606 230508 698739 936896 148516 979682 001477 > 3¹⁶⁴ [i]