Best Known (216−85, 216, s)-Nets in Base 3
(216−85, 216, 156)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (131, 216, 156)-net over F3, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (131, 218, 156)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 109, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 109, 78)-net over F9, using
(216−85, 216, 209)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (131, 216, 209)-net over F3, using
(216−85, 216, 2245)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (131, 216, 2246)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (131, 215, 2246)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 3 857146 436452 062234 400174 583267 655329 783222 681826 514148 336332 877394 530742 765598 515257 529974 797913 806269 > 3215 [i]