Best Known (233−85, 233, s)-Nets in Base 3
(233−85, 233, 156)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (148, 233, 156)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (147, 233, 156)-net over F3, using
- 17 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (147, 250, 156)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 125, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 125, 78)-net over F9, using
- 17 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (147, 250, 156)-net over F3, using
(233−85, 233, 278)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (148, 233, 278)-net over F3, using
(233−85, 233, 3525)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (148, 233, 3526)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (148, 232, 3526)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 494 134099 080879 999968 032972 599019 983845 179892 234415 136837 862611 154342 034464 484686 311921 835270 195324 519026 936765 > 3232 [i]