Best Known (145, 145+85, s)-Nets in Base 3
(145, 145+85, 156)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (145, 230, 156)-net over F3, using
- 16 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (145, 246, 156)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 123, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 123, 78)-net over F9, using
(145, 145+85, 265)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (145, 230, 265)-net over F3, using
(145, 145+85, 3256)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (145, 230, 3257)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (145, 229, 3257)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 18 351725 270143 354654 525546 123594 590090 954550 424095 550841 258774 861299 512911 437266 230387 596295 215563 857578 712153 > 3229 [i]