Best Known (46, 46+85, s)-Nets in Base 3
(46, 46+85, 48)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (46, 131, 48)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (45, 131, 48)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 47)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 45 and N(F) ≥ 48, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 47)-sequence over F3, using
(46, 46+85, 56)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (46, 131, 56)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (40, 131, 56)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 55)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 40 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 55)-sequence over F3, using
(46, 46+85, 146)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (46, 131, 147)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (46, 130, 147)-net in base 3, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(3130, 147, S3, 84), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 610951 874237 245179 799757 396293 504258 972145 948730 720728 290459 967541 402306 / 4917 657235 > 3130 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(3130, 147, S3, 84), but