Best Known (224−86, 224, s)-Nets in Base 3
(224−86, 224, 156)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (138, 224, 156)-net over F3, using
- 8 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (138, 232, 156)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 116, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 116, 78)-net over F9, using
(224−86, 224, 232)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (138, 224, 232)-net over F3, using
(224−86, 224, 2539)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (138, 224, 2540)-net in base 3, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 75645 791884 816467 349055 745149 260417 834150 536240 055472 814393 297010 091157 160629 409016 141927 120536 931606 320785 > 3224 [i]