Best Known (249−87, 249, s)-Nets in Base 3
(249−87, 249, 162)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (162, 249, 162)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (157, 249, 162)-net over F3, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (157, 250, 162)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (32, 125, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (32, 125, 81)-net over F9, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (157, 250, 162)-net over F3, using
(249−87, 249, 334)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (162, 249, 334)-net over F3, using
(249−87, 249, 4724)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (162, 249, 4725)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (162, 248, 4725)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 21331 762566 664428 789196 244000 331816 751925 868081 766133 194389 626046 708249 868143 255319 788468 762031 814453 268979 300229 092299 > 3248 [i]