Best Known (161−89, 161, s)-Nets in Base 3
(161−89, 161, 52)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (72, 161, 52)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (13, 57, 24)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 23)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 24, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 23)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (15, 104, 28)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 27)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 27)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (13, 57, 24)-net over F3, using
(161−89, 161, 84)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (72, 161, 84)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (71, 161, 84)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (71, 83)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 71 and N(F) ≥ 84, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (71, 83)-sequence over F3, using
(161−89, 161, 426)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (72, 161, 427)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (72, 160, 427)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 22292 645318 821470 189271 100314 500270 009336 233826 267293 041077 805251 063891 629193 > 3160 [i]