Best Known (169−89, 169, s)-Nets in Base 3
(169−89, 169, 60)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (80, 169, 60)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (15, 59, 28)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 27)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 27)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (21, 110, 32)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 31)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 31)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (15, 59, 28)-net over F3, using
(169−89, 169, 84)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (80, 169, 84)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (71, 169, 84)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (71, 83)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 71 and N(F) ≥ 84, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (71, 83)-sequence over F3, using
(169−89, 169, 530)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (80, 169, 531)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (80, 168, 531)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 153 268343 919688 119654 066980 629714 564878 144058 486734 143896 154386 547728 004133 995785 > 3168 [i]