Best Known (227−89, 227, s)-Nets in Base 3
(227−89, 227, 156)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (138, 227, 156)-net over F3, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (138, 232, 156)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 116, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 116, 78)-net over F9, using
(227−89, 227, 221)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (138, 227, 221)-net over F3, using
(227−89, 227, 2392)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (138, 227, 2393)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (138, 226, 2393)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 685369 440192 881589 939997 123597 852759 851832 915478 713755 217382 627049 864521 251732 045416 354011 118184 378302 479025 > 3226 [i]