Best Known (235−89, 235, s)-Nets in Base 3
(235−89, 235, 156)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (146, 235, 156)-net over F3, using
- 13 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (146, 248, 156)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 124, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 124, 78)-net over F9, using
(235−89, 235, 252)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (146, 235, 252)-net over F3, using
(235−89, 235, 2930)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (146, 235, 2931)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (146, 234, 2931)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 4459 054563 955419 346995 373913 276261 564374 702501 713116 711832 774455 375312 076228 397843 704804 342817 738272 964400 924937 > 3234 [i]