Best Known (135, 135+89, s)-Nets in Base 3
(135, 135+89, 156)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (135, 224, 156)-net over F3, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (135, 226, 156)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 113, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 113, 78)-net over F9, using
(135, 135+89, 210)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (135, 224, 210)-net over F3, using
(135, 135+89, 2216)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (135, 224, 2217)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (135, 223, 2217)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 25281 089045 116953 091426 239177 045061 937002 940288 839439 246828 652040 209923 536931 079070 563911 203352 735379 535665 > 3223 [i]