Best Known (86, 86+89, s)-Nets in Base 3
(86, 86+89, 65)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (86, 175, 65)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (15, 59, 28)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 27)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 27)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (27, 116, 37)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26, N(F) = 36, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 36, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (15, 59, 28)-net over F3, using
(86, 86+89, 85)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (86, 175, 85)-net over F3, using
(86, 86+89, 622)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (86, 175, 623)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (86, 174, 623)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 108407 983413 849631 859658 970224 201110 010573 849408 774965 456858 072602 884813 592782 448809 > 3174 [i]