Best Known (93, 93+9, s)-Nets in Base 3
(93, 93+9, 2097515)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (93, 102, 2097515)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (8, 12, 365)-net over F3, using
- digital (81, 90, 2097150)-net over F3, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(390, 2097150, F3, 9, 9) (dual of [(2097150, 9), 18874260, 10]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 4-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(390, 8388601, F3, 9) (dual of [8388601, 8388511, 10]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(390, large, F3, 9) (dual of [large, large−90, 10]-code), using
- the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 14348906 = 315−1, defining interval I = [1,9], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 10 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(390, large, F3, 9) (dual of [large, large−90, 10]-code), using
- OOA 4-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(390, 8388601, F3, 9) (dual of [8388601, 8388511, 10]-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(390, 2097150, F3, 9, 9) (dual of [(2097150, 9), 18874260, 10]-NRT-code), using
(93, 93+9, large)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (93, 102, large)-net over F3, using
- 32 times duplication [i] based on digital (91, 100, large)-net over F3, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–VarÅ¡amov bound [i] based on linear OA(3100, large, F3, 9) (dual of [large, large−100, 10]-code), using
- 10 times code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OA(390, large, F3, 9) (dual of [large, large−90, 10]-code), using
- the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 14348906 = 315−1, defining interval I = [1,9], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 10 [i]
- 10 times code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OA(390, large, F3, 9) (dual of [large, large−90, 10]-code), using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–VarÅ¡amov bound [i] based on linear OA(3100, large, F3, 9) (dual of [large, large−100, 10]-code), using
(93, 93+9, large)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (93, 102, large)-net in base 3, because
- 7 times m-reduction [i] would yield (93, 95, large)-net in base 3, but