Best Known (235−90, 235, s)-Nets in Base 3
(235−90, 235, 156)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (145, 235, 156)-net over F3, using
- 11 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (145, 246, 156)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 123, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 123, 78)-net over F9, using
(235−90, 235, 243)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (145, 235, 243)-net over F3, using
(235−90, 235, 2689)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (145, 235, 2690)-net in base 3, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 13362 980731 199789 270819 601175 071932 548514 593625 055149 511140 331275 365236 639181 238605 428500 652792 881741 649674 900493 > 3235 [i]