Best Known (239−93, 239, s)-Nets in Base 3
(239−93, 239, 156)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (146, 239, 156)-net over F3, using
- 9 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (146, 248, 156)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 124, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 124, 78)-net over F9, using
(239−93, 239, 236)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (146, 239, 236)-net over F3, using
(239−93, 239, 2602)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (146, 239, 2603)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (146, 238, 2603)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 365065 626124 272249 215380 717833 386241 029169 204243 791157 047706 621530 443425 913270 213763 631075 918724 507650 141879 244317 > 3238 [i]