Best Known (145, 145+95, s)-Nets in Base 3
(145, 145+95, 156)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (145, 240, 156)-net over F3, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (145, 246, 156)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 123, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 123, 78)-net over F9, using
(145, 145+95, 226)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (145, 240, 226)-net over F3, using
(145, 145+95, 2404)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (145, 240, 2405)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (145, 239, 2405)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 1 086444 986069 006365 612059 493460 953519 221607 152548 438598 072256 397124 903982 122364 592747 437588 111126 945272 217463 173755 > 3239 [i]