Best Known (200−96, 200, s)-Nets in Base 3
(200−96, 200, 74)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (104, 200, 74)-net over F3, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (104, 204, 74)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (27, 77, 37)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26, N(F) = 36, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 36, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (27, 127, 37)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3 (see above)
- digital (27, 77, 37)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(200−96, 200, 112)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (104, 200, 112)-net over F3, using
(200−96, 200, 865)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (104, 200, 866)-net in base 3, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 279671 678483 152162 977647 142538 097264 471066 939213 734578 637740 093347 230331 271540 294605 589957 755361 > 3200 [i]