Best Known (106, 106+96, s)-Nets in Base 3
(106, 106+96, 74)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (106, 202, 74)-net over F3, using
- 8 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (106, 210, 74)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (27, 79, 37)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26, N(F) = 36, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 36, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (27, 131, 37)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3 (see above)
- digital (27, 79, 37)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(106, 106+96, 116)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (106, 202, 116)-net over F3, using
(106, 106+96, 907)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (106, 202, 908)-net in base 3, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 2 430280 918756 831282 664015 477131 838502 293280 280254 484062 907169 604941 454787 001749 950267 696013 115265 > 3202 [i]