Best Known (87, 113, s)-Nets in Base 3
(87, 113, 464)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (87, 113, 464)-net over F3, using
- 31 times duplication [i] based on digital (86, 112, 464)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 28, 116)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 116, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 28, 116)-net over F81, using
(87, 113, 788)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (87, 113, 788)-net over F3, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(3113, 788, F3, 26) (dual of [788, 675, 27]-code), using
- 38 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (3, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 6 times 0, 1, 8 times 0, 1, 12 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(3104, 741, F3, 26) (dual of [741, 637, 27]-code), using
- construction XX applied to C1 = C([340,364]), C2 = C([342,365]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([342,364]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C([340,365]) [i] based on
- linear OA(397, 728, F3, 25) (dual of [728, 631, 26]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 728 = 36−1, defining interval I = {340,341,…,364}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 26 [i]
- linear OA(397, 728, F3, 24) (dual of [728, 631, 25]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 728 = 36−1, defining interval I = {342,343,…,365}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 25 [i]
- linear OA(3103, 728, F3, 26) (dual of [728, 625, 27]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 728 = 36−1, defining interval I = {340,341,…,365}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 27 [i]
- linear OA(391, 728, F3, 23) (dual of [728, 637, 24]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 728 = 36−1, defining interval I = {342,343,…,364}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 24 [i]
- linear OA(31, 7, F3, 1) (dual of [7, 6, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(31, s, F3, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
- linear OA(30, 6, F3, 0) (dual of [6, 6, 1]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(30, s, F3, 0) (dual of [s, s, 1]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
- construction XX applied to C1 = C([340,364]), C2 = C([342,365]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([342,364]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C([340,365]) [i] based on
- 38 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (3, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 6 times 0, 1, 8 times 0, 1, 12 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(3104, 741, F3, 26) (dual of [741, 637, 27]-code), using
(87, 113, 39767)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (87, 113, 39768)-net in base 3, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 821906 623954 165515 661233 765192 083748 821502 287351 694257 > 3113 [i]