Best Known (88, 113, s)-Nets in Base 3
(88, 113, 464)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (88, 113, 464)-net over F3, using
- 31 times duplication [i] based on digital (87, 112, 464)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (86, 112, 464)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 28, 116)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 116, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 28, 116)-net over F81, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (86, 112, 464)-net over F3, using
(88, 113, 1094)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (88, 113, 1094)-net over F3, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(3113, 1094, F3, 2, 25) (dual of [(1094, 2), 2075, 26]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(3113, 2188, F3, 25) (dual of [2188, 2075, 26]-code), using
- the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 2188 | 314−1, defining interval I = [0,12], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−12,−11,…,12}|+1 = 26 (BCH-bound) [i]
- OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(3113, 2188, F3, 25) (dual of [2188, 2075, 26]-code), using
(88, 113, 75057)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (88, 113, 75058)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (88, 112, 75058)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 273895 698473 926130 454345 754348 267236 777245 538421 833337 > 3112 [i]