Best Known (88, 116, s)-Nets in Base 3
(88, 116, 400)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (88, 116, 400)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 29, 100)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 99)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 100, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 99)-sequence over F81, using
(88, 116, 657)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (88, 116, 657)-net over F3, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(3116, 657, F3, 28) (dual of [657, 541, 29]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(3116, 754, F3, 28) (dual of [754, 638, 29]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(27) ⊂ Ce(22) [i] based on
- linear OA(3109, 729, F3, 28) (dual of [729, 620, 29]-code), using an extension Ce(27) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 728 = 36−1, defining interval I = [1,27], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 28 [i]
- linear OA(391, 729, F3, 23) (dual of [729, 638, 24]-code), using an extension Ce(22) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 728 = 36−1, defining interval I = [1,22], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 23 [i]
- linear OA(37, 25, F3, 4) (dual of [25, 18, 5]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(37, 26, F3, 4) (dual of [26, 19, 5]-code), using
- the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 26 = 33−1, defining interval I = [0,2], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 5 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(37, 26, F3, 4) (dual of [26, 19, 5]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(27) ⊂ Ce(22) [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(3116, 754, F3, 28) (dual of [754, 638, 29]-code), using
(88, 116, 27133)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (88, 116, 27134)-net in base 3, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 22 193650 495190 423844 045596 045135 230981 595977 336171 552053 > 3116 [i]