Best Known (66, 141, s)-Nets in Base 3
(66, 141, 52)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (66, 141, 52)-net over F3, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (66, 142, 52)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (13, 51, 24)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 23)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 24, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 23)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (15, 91, 28)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 27)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 27)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (13, 51, 24)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(66, 141, 64)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (66, 141, 64)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (49, 141, 64)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (49, 63)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 49 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (49, 63)-sequence over F3, using
(66, 141, 432)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (66, 141, 433)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (66, 140, 433)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 6 469450 710638 564573 154462 740708 983937 987988 376188 052312 411267 866579 > 3140 [i]