Best Known (78, 153, s)-Nets in Base 3
(78, 153, 64)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (78, 153, 64)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (15, 52, 28)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 27)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 27)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (26, 101, 36)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (26, 35)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 36, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (26, 35)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (15, 52, 28)-net over F3, using
(78, 153, 84)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (78, 153, 84)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (71, 153, 84)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (71, 83)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 71 and N(F) ≥ 84, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (71, 83)-sequence over F3, using
(78, 153, 632)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (78, 153, 633)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (78, 152, 633)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 3 409984 891957 680419 295856 329034 106018 575848 972690 037362 661984 522346 863331 > 3152 [i]