Best Known (89, 165, s)-Nets in Base 3
(89, 165, 69)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (89, 165, 69)-net over F3, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (89, 171, 69)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (21, 62, 32)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 31)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 31)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (27, 109, 37)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26, N(F) = 36, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 36, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (21, 62, 32)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(89, 165, 107)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (89, 165, 107)-net over F3, using
(89, 165, 849)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (89, 165, 850)-net in base 3, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 5 482570 586946 004537 319442 449567 271805 891103 382613 979933 918632 031519 392009 138269 > 3165 [i]