Best Known (90, 165, s)-Nets in Base 3
(90, 165, 73)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (90, 165, 73)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (26, 63, 36)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (26, 35)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 36, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (26, 35)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (27, 102, 37)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26, N(F) = 36, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 36, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (26, 63, 36)-net over F3, using
(90, 165, 111)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (90, 165, 111)-net over F3, using
(90, 165, 918)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (90, 165, 919)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (90, 164, 919)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 1 812643 445214 354541 095087 179333 458848 920642 375964 990704 963166 232608 601667 811495 > 3164 [i]