Best Known (79, 166, s)-Nets in Base 3
(79, 166, 60)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (79, 166, 60)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (15, 58, 28)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 27)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 27)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (21, 108, 32)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 31)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 31)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (15, 58, 28)-net over F3, using
(79, 166, 84)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (79, 166, 84)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (71, 166, 84)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (71, 83)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 71 and N(F) ≥ 84, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (71, 83)-sequence over F3, using
(79, 166, 530)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (79, 166, 531)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (79, 165, 531)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 5 480640 105038 577259 534575 657490 427769 077224 375846 004204 278663 992382 905366 938395 > 3165 [i]